Ana, I refuse to remain silent on an entry to this Anonymous, 
fellow, to me why you have to care if I have not done anything illegal, immoral or unethical or unlawful. Last straw! They care about them - Rojas and the former are those who have made more than the intent of what they did then if I fail to escape -.
Although this is a fallacy because by unscrupulous people do not care about (are sure to have your back covered by the traffic that exists in favor of payments, money and / or species, not to mention the link of obedience and its consequences), there's my challenge and my merit, if I get that security and triumph spray the Constitution and the law instead of trading in influence, concealment, profit and cronyism.
- You've done something illegal, immoral, unlawful ... Why should you care?.
or business do not consider myself either list. Although a person has many traits and usually about offset the shortcomings of others is very clear that he was stupid, and confidently. Do not think that will cure everything. Each is as it is and although experience helps to change, usually continue to maintain tendendencia. I have never known
double role, I always thought that was neither good nor needed. I have not acquired the habit and this hinders the ability and the practice of "readiness" to achieve a predetermined end.
Why should I care or that important fact, that someone will see the clinic ª h, in my case (I do not know who prepared your own), had developed an evil and wicked "professor Complutense", as I believed?
- That history should / must match us with our profile and our mental state at the time and if not, who have to care about is the unscrupulous bastard who has signed for no reason or justification for internment , psychiatric, in my case, Enrique Rojas, not me, in collusion / s with whom / is being (Birth to this kind of "work" is never free nor without moving, there is always something that the attackers intended to achieve with the move). See if
will present a serious clinical Sr. invented that Rojas has not given a single page. h ª my clinic despite requests I made, where I spent my ESP and I spent my time - knowing that he would not give anything - to put on record that had nothing to give.
This guy, I never had a psychiatric interview. Usually reach a point where he lies no gate.
- If the doctor who signed your little confinement did not see you before you sign, yours may not have data matching your mental state at that time. At the request of h th copy of your clinic and all the material you have on you - that is required to deliver - not give it or give you something invented to match the need for institutionalization. Your expert will demonstrate that it is an invention.
you explain how I created it:
medical certificates where Enrique Rojas prescribed psychiatric clinical trials are the only documents that I have of the above.
1) The first sack for the doctor - or anyone - I believe, are the placement records - showing the guidelines were followed and the certificates contain Rojas - because it is incredible that a petulant narcissistic amoral, which acts as a sham and knows that his colleagues know he is a petulant narcissistic amoral is and has always served as an impostor "Professor Complutense" dares to issue certificates to remove people from among (a thing is lined with fake filling curriculum consultation and selling books and other work with husbands to remove from among women).
- On your documents - that are yours because they concern your person and have had on you - that nobody is going to take you home, if you have to ask more and more irregularities there will hit you and give you anything More tall tales will drop you to not give you anything, is where you will see in your case, if there are irregularities and where they missed the law.
2) Next, I say, they can discuss my case with specialists or other colleagues, friends, acquaintances, and in any circle they see fit, which are not bound by professional secrecy with me and that they only ask for now, do not broadcast the certificates issued by Rojas, but they can learn the contents or copy, if you want, and comment, and that for my part, I thank the media (I will take 13.5 years of struggle and 3 on the Internet repeating , but on planes back from the conference, speaking of the "Chair of Psychiatry at the Complutense" of Rojas and Rojas making). Rojas
Although it was known before they met me (if there are colleagues who know "the skills and readiness" of those so bad acting),
https: / / picasaweb.google.com /
now know better.
- You need not be afraid to see your story if you have been admitted against will or even on the assumption that you (not unlikely after carry the stigma of compulsory admissions during a season) and then were sick / a.
- You have every right in the world to be, or be a patient or about mental state. It is the others who are not entitled to internarte against your will if you do not meet very specific requirements. Do not let yourself be fooled or confused by this.
Trying to turn the tortilla is the first thing that the amoral, which incidentally, also get ready to witness perjury. If there is a God or not, I do not know because I've never seen, but things are coming out even without researching on my part and despite the lack of instruction from the courts.
say that the sea always returns to those who died at sea to land. Maybe not always, but most of the time. For each test there are other also distort the distortion test and explained.
I'd like you to stay clear at the level of general culture, the following:
1 º.) No doctor can internarte in the back (whether you're good, bad or very bad). The physician should communicate it before and decided to explain why your placement and aim pursued.
2 º.) Internarte can not decide if it's seen just before (regardless of what you have husbands, wives, family ... or third cousins).
- And you have the right to choose your doctor. Do not let what you impose a husband or director of a center of Opus Dei and if you imposed by a court, is carried out internally or not, you are entitled to choose an expert, two or all you want ; of your trust, for you to review and give their opinion (that's what without trying and despite "calls Red" was his view, a blast expert who did not know each other, each from a different site, but all saying the same thing, there was no disease or mental disorder, when this "sowing terror" which is considered an expert in PTSD, doctors prescribing issues certificates to give to my detention Juan Cantero Caba, then husband, trying also between both "track called" de Rojas and ex appointment with the intervention of my oldest daughter (I'm sick to hear you say what Opus gives both students and young professionals), the family medical issue another certificate prescribing the placement (Public Health Certificate in these cases, it is a treasure).
- When the wicked is reinforced and abetting public health professionals and / or forensic (as published says that you can find anywhere), I think that is an added complication. The rule of law is more schemes collapse and put solutions in place, it is usual obstacles appear to support schemes.
As Anonymous P, let courage, skill and cleverness. Look for the documentation of your placement and examine it as a hunter, not hunted animal that has fallen into the trap of the amoral and part of the amorality always leave a trail. The documentation will be the key placement that may help you understand and defend yourself (if you have been admitted to cheating and / or graft, will be reflected in the "way of doing ").
0 comments:
Post a Comment