One of the things that resulted in the 3 rd session of the trial de Rojas (575/08) was to come out that "had the same spelling and typographical errors. .. in the documents of the first two attempts at placement ... "
do not know what the Honourable Member in this regard, but I'll explain it here because I think I have an obligation not to remain silent.
We have the following (to understand, open the docs. And compare with Providence and Providence police with Office Office police are under-lined),
1) Each court has its Rulings models, Crafts, Warrants ... they fill with names and details of the procedure that is proceeding.
- You can see that in these models, only changes the place where they should take and some correction is made to reread, in prepositions or spaces (negligible). These models are not what was on that day in court No. 3.
2) The documents are typed by different people in different courts, three days apart. Normally an official type, but the information I have is that they were typed by senior staff, particularly by court clerks of both courts (although it was not present when typed, is very reliable information from sources that fit perfectly with the rest of information I have over the years and experienced personal situations).
3) The courts are independent of each other, do not share files, computers are not networked and tried, in theory, do not know what happens in the other if it does not tell the citizen or user of justice requires docs. for some reason. In any case, any exchange of information to proceed according to law, I enjoyed.
Besides many other details did not fit, if the former had asked for the detention in court (No. 2, with a Rojas certificate, private health), if the court had delegated to the Puerta de Hierro Hospital (public health) and the hospital had sent a report saying that the detention was not appropriate,
- that when you change the police court on 30 , then-husband, go to court next (n º 3), to ask again for hospitalization with a certificate of Rojas (private doctor) and should send me to private psychiatric that the same private health certificate is issued ( Rojas) suggested, without any guarantees by the chief law. Red cooked and ate alone, as if life and mental health of citizens belonging to Rojas,
- and that the discovery of the cake (get away, while I am in search of my complaint and requested attorney exploration of public health or forensic), the former not only because he had not been open court for fraud (he had misled the court again requesting the hospitalization when 48h knew before, Puerta de Hierro had said NO), but also allowed and permitted, as if the king of mambo, and signed up to abdicate so I went ahead (it took 8 years of giving up, I did not believe that the next day, during which not a few suffered harassment, threats and surveillance by detectives without these courts move a finger, despite my complaints).
- also was incomprehensible that Rojas did not cite ... Why did not quoting Rojas for questioning and accused, if he was denouncing the first two and then three attempts to psychiatric detention, which could only be conducted with the participation of Rojas, plus the threat from the beginning there were a 3rd detention if he reported the previous two had been carried out on 3 º?. Juan Cantero
allowed me safely, "you will not get anything in these courts because Rojas had little hand in such courts (despite the warning from the lawyer who did not want to echo the claims of Cantu because it could interpreted as doubt on my part to the courts, also denounced the "excess of sincerity" Cantero because I saw it coming but still had no proof, I'm glad now reported as I said).
4) Documents today show - there are others that show other things - that the court No 2, knowing that the Hospital Puerta de Hierro had said NO to detention, pass the disk to court # 3 - for the secretary court No. 3, do not have to bother typing my name and the few spaces to be typed using the model of each trial (something like, give the stab with the same knife because it's not worth it bother to get another clean).
- They show the zero value of life for these people (I do not call people out of time) that pay the salary, is supposed to protect us, not to assist in kidnapping a man and an ultra Opus Dei proposes, when given x change - I guess these partnerships are not made for art's sake -.
- Amana take me directly to private psychiatric Rojas proposed with enormous cowardice. I rolled away without daring to look me in the face and communicate their thoughts to me. Neither the judges nor the clerk who typed dared to quote me, look at me and question me, although I opened the two courts a process of "preliminary investigation" (1). Even the judges who condemned to death after the war, had the defendant who - like me - was doomed in advance, before him, before passing sentence.
- It is impossible for different people with three days apart from making the same mistakes, the same documents, in the same place of the document with the same person in the same way - a forced psychiatric -.
The great evil of these intrigues, is that they do in the back. A betrayal and surprise, without giving the victim of defending themselves, is the same method used to carry out terrorist actions, with the difference that terrorists do not pay the salary or bonuses, vacation and Moscoso.
These judges and court clerks, to my knowledge, I knew nothing. There could be no cause aversion soul. How
love and manage to give myself to know that Red Iron Gate had said NO to detention?. Is it more immoral?
It seems important not to lose the thread that leads to the root of evil. Juan Cantero decide out of the way to keep all the assets, using the formula that leaves no blame, although that should have Rojas cache at the time - was on trial for the case Menchaca - Because,
Enrique Rojas A intern getting the strength back and healthy women, because as some courts (these and perhaps others) permit and facilitate the knowledge that detention is not necessary (like me happened in the Court 1, with the 3rd. attempt).
The rule of law and judicial corporatism, as they know the facts, instead of grinding, take action and take action to solve the bags of immorality that may exist, hides and tries to hide, so that citizens remain the idea of \u200b\u200ba perfect "Justice" although the idea is fictional. Not a flawless Justice may allow these intrigues and all citizens commune with millstones.
These same judges and prosecutors would not allow the same thing would happen to their daughters, family members, friends or themselves. Why believe that ordinary citizens when we can think of, we keep quiet?
I am convinced that Opus Dei has been for Rojas, contacts, and "calls" - de Rojas and Rojas third party - so it cost me over 13 years and much effort and suffering to get to be tried in without instructing a procedure for a trifle as I have said, for "violation of professional secrecy" (Cantero deliver certificates), however, that was not ALL that Rojas did and continued doing. Although
from the insignificance of an ordinary citizen seems foolish to fight against so many giants, I'm still a David that aims to overcome and do not intend to give up his dream. I'm sure that in Spain or Europe make it all come to light.
0 comments:
Post a Comment